Caroline seizes upon the mirror, and cradles it. It is this mirror that holds the tortured, hateful soul of the Candyman; the only remnant of her lover, Caroline hides the mirror in Daniel’s birthplace.
candyman 2020 cast – Candyman (1992)
As y’all know, we’ve been keeping close tabs on Jordan Peele’s highly anticipated reboot of the classic 1992 horror flick, Candyman. Speaking as someone who has been on this earth since the early 1970s, I can attest to the fact that some movies often behave like wine. They may be novel when they first come out, but after a few years they become bland. However, if you let them age long enough, they become good again, often times embodying a nostalgia factor that makes their imperfections seem endearing.
On the film’s DVD commentary, producer Alan Poul said that had Madsen been unable to step into the role of Helen, the part would have likely been offered to Sandra Bullock, who was still a relative unknown actress at that point. Though she had played the role of Tess McGill in the television adaptation of Working Girl, she was still a couple of years away from Speed (1994), the role that launched her into stardom.
Upon hearing of a recent death at Cabrini-Green attributed to the Candyman, she wants to add a new chapter to her research. Helen investigates and interviews the witnesses who found the dead person and the circumstances which led to the murder. All agree- the Candyman did it.
Todd definitely didn’t sustain 23 bee stings in a single sitting, as that many pricks of the skin by the flying insects’ pointy ends would cause more than just a little discomfort. It wouldn’t kill Todd, though, as the widely accepted number of bee stings sufficient to be lethal is about 10 stings per pound of body weight Assuming that Todd, who stands at 6 feet and 5 inches tall , was between 187 and 229 pounds ( the estimated range for “ideal” body weight based on height), it would take between 1,870 and 2,229 stings sustained in a short period of time to take the actor out. Twenty-three consecutive stings would likely make Todd feel lightheaded and could even cause him to faint, but we doubt that the Candyman production team would endanger Todd like that.
CANDYMAN for me is perhaps one of my favorite genre films. And the story behind it still feels relevant. Even though I get a bit tired of all the remakes and the reboots that are a fixture in modern cinema, there is something that truly excites me when it comes to the promise of what this film could deliver. Since they are bringing Tony Todd back, I’d really like to see Madsen involved in some way. Even though the casting of Kramer for this role brings way more questions than it answers, it only makes me more interested in what they are trying to accomplish here. Do I have doubts? Damn straight, but there is something about this upcoming film that feels especially promising. As well, we haven’t had an adaptation of Barker’s for so long that I’m hoping for a bit of his artfully done bloody goodness back on the big screen. And yes, if Helen Lyle is a part of it, my curiosity is certainly piqued.
Here, the boundaries between myth and reality are fluid – and just as one might easily reconstrue the student’s transmitted story as crazy Billy’s self-justifying account of his own murderous crimes of passion, the rest of Candyman, and the story that it tells about Helen, is open to more than one interpretation, some rational, some supernatural.
But, in attempting to prove the non-existence of Candyman, Helen conjures up the real deal (in the shape of Todd, who delivers a terrifying, almost entirely vocal performance). “You were not content with the stories,” he intones, “so I was obliged to come.” He needs a new victim to revive the myth and, appropriately enough, has decided that it will be the academic who tried to puncture it. “Our names will be written on a thousand walls. Our crimes told and retold by our faithful believers,” he announces. Not quite the quiet life of academe she had been planning on but hey, these things happen.
As Helen, a white, middle-class woman herself, crosses the threshold of her own city’s African-American underclass, she is confronted with a history of abject impoverishment and marginalisation that she has (literally, given her elevated condo) overlooked. Helen fills the unbridgeable gulf between Cabrini Green and her own life with myth and madness, calling upon Candyman (Tony Todd) at the mirror and finding a place in his immortal legend for herself.
After reading the news, I decided to watch the first film again to get a feel for how her character could come back. They certainly do have her return in the final scene as yet another urban legend – perhaps one that goes after cheating spouses. But I highly doubt that the final scare in Rose’s feature will be the direction the new film goes. So how do you bring Helen back? Is she just like Candyman himself and will they stick with the original ending? Will they present her only in flashbacks in some form? Or will the give us an alternate fate for the bright but troubled grad student? After all, that last choice worked well enough to make the recent HALLOWEEN a hit. And the last question I have… what time period will this take place? Clearly this cannot be a modern film if she is returning at Kramer’s young age. A current story would have made a ton of awesome sense if they brought back the incredible Madsen to reprise the role.
While researching urban myths, grad student Helen Lyle (Virginia Madsen) learns about the Candyman (Tony Todd), a hook-handed creature who’s said to haunt a Chicago housing project. After a mysterious man matching the Candyman’s description begins stalking her, Helen comes to fear that the legend may be all too real.
The cosy, white-fenced house, where Clara ( Marianna Elliott ) and Billy ( Ted Raimi – brother of Spider-Man director Sam Raimi ), unwisely tempt fate by saying the name of Candyman five times into the mirror, is 4222 Agnes Avenue, Studio City in the San Fernando Valley.
When Philip Glass signed on to compose the score for Candyman, he apparently envisioned the final film being something totally different. According to Rolling Stone , What he’d presumed would be an artful version of Clive Barker’s short story ‘The Forbidden’ had ended up, in his view, a low-budget slasher.” Glass was reportedly disappointed in the film, and felt that he had been manipulated. Still, the haunting music is considered a classic score—and Glass’s own view of it seems to have softened over time. It has become a classic, so I still make money from that score, get checks every year,” he told Variety in 2014.
Though the role of Candyman turned Tony Todd into a horror icon, he wasn’t the only actor in consideration for the film’s title role: Eddie Murphy was also reportedly a contender for the part. Though it’s unclear exactly why he wasn’t cast, sources have reported that it had to do with everything from his height (at 5 feet 9 inches, he wouldn’t seem nearly as intimidating as the 6-foot-5 Todd) to his salary demands.
His attire consists of a large brown fur trenchcoat, a white cravat around his neck, gray pants, a pair of polished leather shoes and a bloody hook in place of his right hand, which he uses to mutilate his victims. His trenchcoat is used in order to conceal his grotesque mutilations — the product of the torture that he suffered shortly before his death. Underneath it is his skinless ribcage and hollowed-out abdomen, as well as his internal organs that are being infested by the many bees living within him. His hair is jet-black and curly, but kept very short.
Candyman is based on a Clive Barker story. The 1992 film starred Tony Todd as Candyman, a former slave lynched for a relationship with a white woman. If you say his name five times in the mirror, he comes for you. The film spawned two sequels.
Yet, despite his tragic death, the audience is not directed to be sympathetic towards this character. We never learn his real name in the movie. He’s only concerned with perpetuating his own undead existence through horrifying means. He’s more useful as a monster than as a human, a political calculus that’s infected America from the start. This callousness is just one of many dissonant elements throbbing under Candyman’s exposed ribcage, spotlighting how folklore by black people — and folklore about black people — have often been at odds. White hegemony has made it so that the morbid whispers of the latter category can multiply in force until commonly accepted, ultimately becoming powerful enough to permanently imprint on a nation’s psyche.
Candyman is based on a short story by horror legend Clive Barker, eventually going on to star in a series of films as played by Tony Todd. In the stories, Candyman is revealed to have once been a mortal man – a painter living in a fledgling Chicago. He became a famous for his art and was eventually hired to make a painting of the daughter of a wealthy landowner. The artist and the daughter fell in love, and she ended up becoming pregnant. Learning of the affair, the landowner assembled a lynch mob to murder him.
The minutiae surrounding Candyman’s human existence is told a bit different in the first Candyman than it is in Farewell to the Flesh, but the essence of the story remains the same. Daniel Robitaille was the son of a former slave who managed to ascend to higher levels of society by inventing a machine to mass produce shoes following the end of the Civil War. Daniel, a talented painter, grew up seemingly accepted as a member of the elite, attending ivy league schools and associating with wealthy white people. Unfortunately, as an adult, Daniel was hired by a rich white man to paint a portrait of his daughter Caroline, and the two fell in love, resulting in the conception of a child. Needless to say, Daniel’s employer wasn’t pleased about that development.
I hope that they don’t dance around the interracial relationship between Candyman and the love of his life, the reason for his death and that they are actually allowed to kiss. Back then it was rare that African-American male film stars got to kiss any of the white leading ladies they worked with. I’m just speaking my mind here.
Candyman is one of my favorite movies, so my reading of this story is long overdue. Trying to review it on its own merit, I would say it’s a compelling and enjoyable short story. It’s difficult not to compare it to the movie, which is more fleshed out and has Tony Todd, so I would definitely say the movie is better, but if you’re already a fan, I recommend taking in this source material.
Contrary to what you might read on the internet, author Clive Barker simply made this legend up for his short story The Forbidden” in his fifth volume of The Books of Blood. This tale was then adapted for the screen by Bernard Rose, who directed the film.
This film is based upon a story written by British writer Clive Barker. More of a thriller than a stright horror movie, Virginia Madsen starts as Helen Lyle, a grad student at the University of Illinois at Chicago. She, and her friend, are writing a thesis on modern folklore. One story she is researching is of the “Candyman”, a slave spirit with a hook hand who is said to haunt Chicago’s notorious Cabrini-Green housing projects.